Accessibility statement
Selling tested websites and shipping an untested one would be hard to defend, so this sets out what has actually been done — including what has not.
Conformance
This site aims to conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA, and to the best of my testing it does, with the exceptions below.
That claim is self-assessed. It has not been verified by a third party, and I both built and tested it — exactly the arrangement I would flag as a limitation in someone else's audit, so I am flagging it in mine.
What has been done
- Skip link, visible on focus
- Semantic landmarks, one
h1per page, no skipped heading levels - Focus indicators on every interactive element, never removed
- Labelled form controls with hints tied by
aria-describedby
- Colour contrast measured and recorded in the stylesheet — lowest text ratio in use is 6.49:1
- Light and dark themes, both measured
- Full keyboard operability — there is no JavaScript, so nothing depends on a pointer
- Responsive to 400% zoom without horizontal scrolling
Known limitations
A statement that lists nothing is not being maintained. These are current.
-
The quote form does not submit
It is not connected to a handler yet. The page says so and gives an email address instead. Until it works there are no success or error states to test.
-
Typefaces load from a third party
Google Fonts. If that request fails the site falls back to system fonts and stays fully readable, but it is an external dependency I would rather not have.
-
No third-party audit
Self-assessed only, by the person who built it.
-
No privacy notice yet
Needed before the form collects anything.
Feedback
Email hello@cherubdesign.co.uk with the page address and what went wrong. I aim to reply within five working days. If you find something I have missed, it is the most useful thing you could send me.
Last reviewed September 2026. To be re-reviewed on deployment to the live domain, and whenever a colour, form or component changes.